World Bank exposes Uzodinma on fiscal performance in governance

Sometime in 2017, the world apex bank introduced a performance-based programme that would make them monitor and rate the fiscal performance of states.

 

To that effect, the world bank entered into a mutual agreement with the Federal Government which gave birth to a programme known as The State Fiscal Transparency, Accountability and Sustainability (SFTAS) Programme.

 

The rationale behind the State Fiscal Transparency, Accountability and Sustainability (SFTAS) Programme is informed by the current serious fiscal challenges faced by the states with many unable to pay the backlog of salary arrears of several months due to poor fiscal governance occasioned by the high cost of governance, profligacy poor revenue drive amongst others.

 

Most states with the exception of a few have weak fiscal transparency and accountability structures characterized by unpublished budgets & financial statements, lack of timely budget implementation reports, very high budget deviation (between 30% to 55%) and their Citizens are never engaged in the budget process. State Executives believe they are not accountable to the citizens and hence do not need their input in major policy decision-making processes particularly budget processes where everybody is kept in the dark.

 

This Programme was WorldBank’s strategy for rating the fiscal governance of all 36 States of Nigeria so as to encourage fiscal transparency and integrity by rewarding such states with grants and/or technical support.

 

Hence under the ‘Program for Result’ (PforR), states that meet the ranking criteria will be rewarded with a performance-based grant, whereas those that fail to meet the criteria lose the reward.

 

The PforR component is ex-ante open to 36 states and FCT for participation. However, in order, to be eligible to access the annual performance-based grants, states must achieve the Eligibility Criteria (EC) for the performance year. The Program allows for different entry points by states. States not achieving the EC in Year 1 won’t access Year 1 performance-based grants; however, they can aim to join the Program in Year 2 or 3.

 

Eligibility Criteria (EC): For each year of the Program, states will need to publish on a timely basis the annual approved state budgets and annual audited financial statements. In years 3 and 4 of the Program, states are further required to align with international best practices through (1) the use of the national chart of accounts/budget classification system, which is GFS compliant, to prepare the states’ annual budgets and thus foster comparability of budget classifications across the federation; and (2) states’ audited financial statements are prepared in accordance with International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS).

 

The Performance year include;

YEAR 1; 1st Jan 2018- 1st Jan 2019

YEAR 2; 1st Jan 2019- 1st Jan 2020

YEAR 3; 1st Jan 2020- 1st Jan 2021

YEAR 4; 1st Jan 2021-1st Jan  2022.

 

States who meet up with the Performance, Eligibility Criteria for a particular year will be awarded a grant of 2million USD and as such qualify for the next year, whereas states that do not meet up with the criteria for a particular year can reapply to join the program the next year.

 

Imo State in the 2018-2019  year of Performance Eligibility Criteria review did not meet up with the criteria hence was ineligible for the grant.

 

Whereas from 2019 till 2021 Imo State has met all the performance criteria for Fiscal Performance in Governance and has received the grant of 2m USD twice.

 

This rating by WORLD BANK EXPOSES UZODIMMA’S GOVERNMENT ON FISCAL PERFORMANCE IN GOVERNANCE and further reveals the level of Transparency, Integrity and Prudence at which Hope Uzodimma is managing the resources of the state thus growing her internal revenue base. Little wonder 75% of the 2022 budget of Imo State is projected to be funded with IGR.

 

With such signature Performance Ranking by a globally reputable orga